10
Apr
Sustainable Development Is The Wise Use Of. Sustainable development refers to a mode of human development in which resource use aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present but also for generations to come. Meaningful involvement of local communi- ties in decision making is a central element of both wetland wise use and successful tourism. When non-living resources are used it will be ensured that such use is consistent with environmental best-practice bearing in mind the need to provide also for future generations. Integrated Coastal Zone management all essential in ensuring sustainable water resources and survivable ecosystems in the future.
Similar to the Convention on Biological Diversitys ecosystem approach Ramsars wise use principle enshrined in the convention text recommends a. 2 Government must be committed to safeguarding the interests of. Public understanding and awareness of the meaning of sustainable development and its day-to-day implications is increased. Well-managed tourism development in and around wetlands. Integrated Coastal Zone management all essential in ensuring sustainable water resources and survivable ecosystems in the future. The central idea behind wise use is that all the benefits wetlands provide must be considered and incorporated when people make decisions that affect them.
Sustainable development which is a pattern of resource use that aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present but also for generations to come.
2 Government must be committed to safeguarding the interests of. Wise use was a highly progressive term when coined by the Conventions founders in 1973 long before sustainable development was mainstream and it continues to be useful today. Diverse groups of local communities including some of the most marginalised local communities live within or close to wetlands. Sustainable development can be defined as an approach to the economic development of a country without compromising with the quality of the environment for future generations. Such use is wise sustainable and consistent with the integrity of ecosystems and evolutionary processes. I review this wilderness debate and argue that critical distinctions between wildness and wilderness and self and other must.